design, model, present, analyze, realize...
Since many free‑form modelers are not accurate enough for manufacturing or engineering analysis, and since Rhino is a free‑form modeler, many people assume Rhino is not accurate enough for their application.
In fact, Rhino is just as or even more accurate than most CAD software.
Here are the details:
There are two common methods 3‑D models are stored in computers.
The first method is using meshes (sometimes called faces or facets), which are usually used for rendering, animation, or conceptual design. While mesh modelers often have what appear to be precise techniques for creating models like spheres, boxes, splines, or even NURBS, behind the scenes, they eventually turn everything into a mesh. Meshes are inherently inaccurate because a mesh is simply a collection flat triangles. Even if the surface is curved, a mesh modeler still represents it with flat triangles. This is fine for most renderings, animations, and games, but not when designing for manufacturing. It should be noted that many manufacturing processes use meshes, but the mesh density must be under the control of the manufacturing application to achieve the desired accuracy. Rhino does not use meshes for modeling, but it can convert NURBS to meshes at any density as needed for file exports and rendering.
The second method is NURBS. Most CAD, CAM, CAE, and CAID modelers, including Rhino, represent free‑form shapes as NURBS. Products that use NURBS can potentially represent free‑form shapes accurately enough for the most demanding application if they are diligent in their NURBS implementation. If an application’s primary focus is machinery design and not free‑form shapes, it is possible for its NURBS implementation to be less than robust for demanding free‑form modeling. This is typical of the mid-range feature-based parametric solid modelers that are so popular today.
Since Rhino’s focus is free‑form NURBS modeling, its NURBS implementation is one of the most robust available today. Here are the primary considerations when evaluating whether a modeler is accurate enough for your application:
Because of the limitation of current computer technology, we expect calculations to be accurate to 15 digits of precision in a range from ±1020 to ±10-20. This limitation is found in all modern CAD products.
Older CAD products often have additional limitations because they were developed originally to run on computers with less precision. For example, many CAD modelers are designed for performing calculations on geometry that is restricted to be in a box of size 1000x1000x1000 meters centered at the origin. (Geek alert: Another popular off-the-shelf modeling kernel requires parameterizations that are within a factor of 10 of being arc-length parameterizations.) Rhino has none of the limitations found in these older products.
If you carefully examine the geometry other modelers produce
from free‑form surface intersections, free‑form fillet creation,
and free‑form surface offsets, you will discover that this free‑form
geometry is actually calculated with accuracy between 10-2
and 10-4 meters even though the precision advertised
is 10-8 (without mentioning that the units are meters).
Other things to consider:
In summary, Rhino is at least as accurate as
any other CAD product on the market today. In addition, Rhino provides
tools for setting accuracy and units and tools for controlling
and evaluating continuity not found in most CAD products.